Skip to content
MNSTRY.org
Menu Explore

Topic · 6 articles

Tacit knowledge

Every method that works eventually gets written down, and the writing carries the structure and leaves the judgment behind. These articles begin with what codification can still do, then walk the remainder from licensed methodology to the question of where a person belongs in a workflow once the places judgment sits can be named. The cases are coaching, therapy, and early childhood education, and none of the argument is confined to them.

Start reading The five-minute version

The through-line: Discernment and The craft and The honest instrument and What remains valuable , the long reads these articles expand on.

  1. 1 Start with what codification is for: making the judgment it cannot carry smaller and easier to locate, so apprenticeship can concentrate where discrimination is still required. The tacit remainder
  2. 2 Once the remainder is visible, map the moments it occupies: decision trees, micro-timing, interpretive frameworks, and feedback loops. Structure transfers, judgment does not
  3. 3 If the judgment does not travel and the vocabulary costs nothing to carry, the word arrives everywhere long before the skill does, including in our own field. Label drift
  4. 4 The proposed cure for drifting labels is a delivery that never varies, which turns out to be the same error read from the other end. Consistency is not fidelity
  5. 5 Ask where the remainder was being produced in the first place, and you arrive at the unpriced work that machine intelligence is currently absorbing. The vanishing apprenticeship
  6. 6 End with where the remainder belongs once you can name it, which is a placement problem rather than a modeling problem. Wise workflows

You have walked Tacit knowledge end to end: what codification is for, what a certification really transfers, what the word does without the skill, why perfect consistency is the wrong promise, where judgment used to be grown, and where a person belongs once the remainder can be named. Codification never carried the judgment. What it can do is show exactly what still has to be learned from somebody.

Practice Take one method you learned from a book or a course and one you learned from a person. For each, write down a single decision the written version cannot make for you, then say which of the four dimensions that decision lives in, decision trees, micro-timing, interpretive frameworks, or feedback loops. The second list will be longer and more specific than the first, and the difference between them is what you were actually taught by being near someone.

Follow this topic: RSS · agent version