<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>MNSTRY.org · Tacit knowledge</title>
    <link>https://mnstry.org/topics/tacit/</link>
    <description>Every method that works eventually gets written down, and the writing carries
the structure and leaves the judgment behind. These articles begin with what
codification can still do, then walk the remainder from licensed methodology to
the question of where a person belongs in a workflow once the places judgment
sits can be named. The cases are coaching, therapy, and
early childhood education, and none of the argument is confined to them.</description>
    <item>
      <title>The tacit remainder</title>
      <link>https://mnstry.org/writing/the-tacit-remainder/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://mnstry.org/writing/the-tacit-remainder/</guid>
      <description>Codification cannot carry situational judgment, but it can make the remainder small enough to locate. That boundary tells manuals where their authority ends and apprenticeship where its work begins.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Structure transfers, judgment does not</title>
      <link>https://mnstry.org/writing/structure-transfers-judgment-does-not/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://mnstry.org/writing/structure-transfers-judgment-does-not/</guid>
      <description>What a methodology franchise can transfer and what it cannot, decomposed into the four dimensions where the judgment actually sits. The canonical treatment of the structure and judgment split.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Label drift</title>
      <link>https://mnstry.org/writing/label-drift/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://mnstry.org/writing/label-drift/</guid>
      <description>Why informed and inspired multiply around every successful method, what the honest version of that suffix looks like, and the one question that tells a claim from a stance. The canonical treatment of label drift.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Consistency is not fidelity</title>
      <link>https://mnstry.org/writing/consistency-is-not-fidelity/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://mnstry.org/writing/consistency-is-not-fidelity/</guid>
      <description>Why absolute consistency is the wrong promise for an adaptive method, and what has to be stated before fidelity can be claimed at all. The canonical treatment of adaptive fidelity.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The vanishing apprenticeship</title>
      <link>https://mnstry.org/writing/the-vanishing-apprenticeship/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://mnstry.org/writing/the-vanishing-apprenticeship/</guid>
      <description>The crutch effect at institutional scale, where a generation of professionals audits drafts it never learned to write. The canonical treatment of the vanishing apprenticeship.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Wise workflows</title>
      <link>https://mnstry.org/writing/wise-workflows/</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://mnstry.org/writing/wise-workflows/</guid>
      <description>Why the buildable version of practical wisdom is a placement problem rather than a modeling problem, and the two questions that locate where a person belongs. The canonical treatment of wise workflows.</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
